UPGRADE — DO NOT MERGE. GSC: 489 imp. Earns impressions on 'resilience training for employees'. Rewrite as the L&D-buyer angle (training procurement language), distinct from the wellness-buyer and consulting framings.
/resilience-training-for-employeesTraining that takes you somewhere you can measure. The starting point is an assessment; the training that follows is shaped by the data, not by a generic curriculum. The endpoint is a re-test that says whether the training did anything.
Most employee resilience training is delivered as a one-day workshop with a generic curriculum. Participants learn frameworks they don't apply, and the L&D team has no defensible answer when the FD asks what changed.
The training we deliver is different in three ways: it's preceded by an assessment so the content is targeted, it combines workshops with 1:1 coaching for the people whose scores need the most work, and it's followed by a 90-day re-measurement that produces a number.
XXXX Steve to confirm — is the training itself CPD-accredited for participants?
XXXX Per-employee, per-cohort, or per-organisation? Steve to confirm the pricing model L&D procurement expects to see.
XXXX A named or anonymised L&D-led engagement: scope, duration, outcome.